Why Radiation Protection

What healthcare workers need to know.

Navigating Scatter Radiation for Healthcare Professionals

When considering a healthcare career, specifically in spaces that require diagnostic imaging solutions, it's essential to understand the effects of scatter radiation and what measures must be taken to protect yourself and the rest of the medical staff.

Radiation Exposure in Interventional Suites

Radiation Exposure in Interventional Suites

The radiation used in radiology procedures is X-rays, a form of ionizing radiation. This ionizing radiation can eventually cause harmful stochastic effects with prolonged exposure.

Risks of Scatter C-arm Radiation to Medical Teams

Studies have shown an increased risk for various cancers, specifically brain cancer, in healthcare workers occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation. Now more alarming studies find other health risks.**

Brain Tumor
Breast Cancer
Cataracts
Cognitive Degradation
Fetal Exposure
Orthopedic Injury
Thyroid Disease

Safe Exposure Limits

Current standards in the United States by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) allow for the following amounts of exposure in three months:

  • Whole body – 1 ¼ rem
  • Hands, forearms, feet, and ankles – 18 ¾ rem
  • The skin of the whole body – 7 ½ rem

Read These Industry Articles

Enhancing Radiation Safety Culture: Investigating the Mediating Role of Awareness Among Orthopedic Doctors and Operation Theatre Assistants
The increasing use of minimally invasive orthopedic procedures has led to a greater reliance on fluoroscopy, resulting in elevated radiation exposure for surgeons.
Update on Radiation Safety in the Cath Lab – Moving Toward a “Lead-Free” Environment
Improving radiation protection will enhance the quality of life for the cath lab. Heavy protective lead aprons, moveable shields, and poor ergonomics remain barriers to a safer environment. Innovations in shielding systems will permit the CCL team to work in a personal “lead-free” environment.
Occupational Safety in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory
Lead-free, lead-composite garments, and 0.25-mm and 0.35-mm lead aprons are up to 30% lighter. Still, bench testing for radiation transmission has yielded variable results compared with the standard 0.5-mm lead garment, thus questioning the safety of these devices regarding radiation protection.
Shifting the Paradigm for Healthcare Workers’ Protection
Renewed attention has focused on the occupational health hazards posed by working in the fluoroscopic laboratory. Accumulated occupational radiation exposure is associated with health risks to physicians, nurses, and technologists working in this environment.
Recommendations for Occupational Radiation Protection in Interventional Cardiology
The radiation dose received by cardiologists during percutaneous coronary interventions, electrophysiology procedures, and other interventional cardiology procedures can vary by more than an order of magnitude for the same type of procedure and for similar patient doses.

Protection for the Healthcare Team

Using lead aprons, glasses, and gloves has been the current preventative measure to protect healthcare workers from radiation exposure. Other shielding technologies are often used but may only offer partial protection to the treating physician and limited protection to the rest of the medical team.

c-arm-680

Novel Solution To Radiation Exposure

The Radiaction Dynamic Smart Shield significantly reduces scatter radiation in the procedure room by an average of 90%, ensuring the safety of medical staff.* There’s no need to continuously add more lead weight, which can lead to orthopedic issues. Experience comprehensive radiation protection with Radiaction—we provide the level of protection you need.

*Measurements were conducted using Radcal ion chambers and solid-state sensors in a demonstration cath lab at four positions around the C-arm, which represent typical locations for cath lab personnel. For each position, measurements were taken at pelvis/lower body height and head/neck height. A RANDO® anthropomorphic male phantom was utilized to simulate a patient and generate scatter.

Dose rates were measured and compared between the same positions with and without Radiaction’s shield system and without any other radiation protection equipment. Measurements were taken at various C-arm angles, ranging from AP to 80° LAO and 30° RAO, as well as from 30° CRA to 30° CAUD, covering a total of 44 different angles. At each angle, three dose rate measurements were recorded. The average dose rate reduction was calculated for each angle and sensor position, and an overall average reduction was then computed for all measurements taken.

System Features

FDA Class II Clearance Features

FDA Class II Clearance

Radiation Blocking

Radiation Blocking at the Source

Staff Protection

Protection Throughout the Procedure Room

Rapid Deployment

Rapid Deployment and Retraction (2-3 Seconds)

Patient Access

Allows Immediate Patient Access

C-Arm

Seamless Integration into Procedural Workflow

*Laish-Farkash A, et al. EuroIntervention 2022;18:262-266.
**Grazia Andreassi M, Piccaluga E, Guagliumi G, et al. Occupational Health Risks in Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Workers. Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions. 2016; e003273 9 4, doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003273

Scroll to Top